What I meant (re: Blaine rarely gets to do anything) is that because he is rarely an active agent in the narrative (marginalized), he rarely actually screws up (aside from your, um...rather biased perspective on things - for example, your assessment of what all went down in DWS and the fact that you are trying to claim that the stuff with Sebastian was WORSE than Kurt's cheating, when the former was strictly platonic and not fulfilling a void in Blaine's relationship).
Anonymous

Really, still? You know, the crux of my argument was that my interpretation is mine and your interpretation is yours, and yours belongs on your blog and not in my ask box. 

OF COURSE you disagree with me about Blaine screwing up. You are a Blaine-stan, and on the whole you guys hate admitting that your boy is imperfect. I admit that I’m biased, where is your admission? 

And no, Kurt talking to the cheerful boy from the record store was not worse than Blaine talking to the predatory guy who made it clear that he wanted to fuck Blaine. It was not worse than Blaine shutting up and sighing as Sebastian insulted Kurt and their relationship right in front of him. It was not worse than Blaine talking to Sebastian knowing that Sebastian wanted him, then talking to him more after Kurt said he didn’t like the guy, then sneaking in phone calls and IMs or Skype sessions or whatever even after that. With the guy who was openly attracted to him in a leeringly sexual way. And deliberately hiding every one of those talks or IMs or Skype sessions from his boyfriend.

You say Kurt cheated. Please, tell me exactly how. Do you think Kurt fucked the guy? Do you think they went to Breadstix on the down low? Do you think they shifted from texting each other silly puns about asps into hardcore sexting? That they planned wild raunchy escapades once they were both in New York? 

Tell me that Chandler was a sexual or emotional threat to Klaine. Tell me that with a straight face. Tell me that Kurt looked at him and thought ‘rawr, let me get some of that nerdy, excitable blond ass’. PLEASE tell me that Klaine is that fucking weak. Tell me that the emotional fulfillment that Kurt got from Chandler’s ridiculous texted compliments would have been any different if it had been a straight guy or a female sending them to him. What Kurt got from Chandler is confirmation that he’s still an interesting person to someone. What Blaine got from Sebastian was knowledge that someone wanted to fuck him, and wanted it bad. Which one was worse again?

We do not agree. Your continued presence in my ask box will not make me agree with you. You and I see things differently. AND THAT IS OKAY. It’s allowed, it’s life. You may walk away from this knowing that people disagree with you but your world is still unshaken. No harm, no foul. 

Also, I’m deleting the other four asks you left me, because seriously? Did you seriously ask me why Dave Karofsky never suffered any consequences for putting Kurt through hell? DID YOU HONESTLY ASK ME THAT?

Also, you claim Blaine has never willingly owned up to doing anything wrong. First of all, he rarely gets to DO anything within the narrative (denied agency in stories like Michael), and I disagree with your assessment of his apology in TFT ("I was drunk, and I'm sorry" meaning, "I acknowledge it wasn't the right time/circumstance, and I apologize for my behavior"). In any case, how about this: "You're right; I have been...distant. And I'm sorry." (from DWS - do you watch Klaine scenes?)
Anonymous

Okay, lets skip right to your end point, because arguing that Blaine never gets to do anything just makes the fact that he’s still an asshole SO OFTEN seem even worse. Also of course you disagree with my interpretation of a scene. We’re never gonna agree on things like that. 

You’re right, my bad: he grudgingly apologized for being distant in the conversation that was otherwise entirely about everything that Kurt was doing wrong and how Kurt might be able to fix it. No, he was never made to actually suffer consequences for being distant, in fact he was more than vocal about how horrible Kurt was for responding to that distance by chatting with another guy. No, he never apologized for publically calling Kurt a cheater and singing him a song about how he never wanted him back. No, he never seemed to understand that what he did with Sebastian wasn’t ‘kind of the same’, it was a thousand times WORSE. He offered one lame apology for a single practically-unshown element of an episode that featured some of his most dickish behavior ever. You’re right, and I’m wrong. 

(And yes, I watch, but like any traumatic memory I block those scenes out later.)

I think you missed the entire point of the Blaine/Finn scene in HOTS, which presented Finn as the shepherd collected a wayward sheep, and proving how great a leader he was, despite what a douchebag he'd been to Blaine. The Blaine/Sam fight (which, btw, Sam reacted to Blaine insulting him by SHOVING him, in case you missed it) was about making Blaine look bad out of nowhere so Finn could look good, despite his behavior the past few months towards Blaine. And he didn't seek out Blaine to apologize
Anonymous

Oh, Blaine-stans. 

I’m sorry, that was dismissive, wasn’t it? Let me try again. If I missed the point of that scene, then so did every single other person on my dash and a hell of a lot more people beside. While I’m willing to admit that that’s possible, I am dubious. 

I have an anti-Blaine bias. I admit that right out. You have a pro-Blaine bias. We see two different things. I don’t, for instance, see Blaine in that scene as the writers wanting to make Blaine look bad. If it had been, someone would have asked him what the hell his problem was before the scene where Finn came to tell him that what happened was all Finn’s fault because he’s totes jelly of Blaine’s talent. It was meant to look as if poor Blaine had been pushed to his limits from all the cruel treatment, which is exactly what the follow-up scene stated outright.  

If it was meant to make Blaine look bad then why did Blaine not have to apologize? Why did he get apologized to? Why did no one mention that he was going too far by slut-shaming the kid who worked to keep his younger siblings fed? (FYI, if the guy who was part of the sexified Warblers last year tried to tell me that the job I took on to support my dirt-poor family meant that I was ‘for sale’ and surely had trouble sleeping at night because of it, I would have shoved his ass too. Don’t bring Sam into this, because Sam wins that scene.)

If Finn didn’t seek Blaine out to apologize, then why did he seek Blaine out? A latent unconscious interest in seeing him shirtless and sweaty? I remain dubious. 

I get this vibe that you dislike Finn. That’s cool, that’s your thing. But realize that your interpretation of the scene is your interpretation, not something to be sent to strangers in anon messages as if it’s indisputable truth. Post it in your blog if you like, the way that I posted my own interpretation. Tag it appropriately, as I did, and vent your frustrations to the world.

Go with Jebus. 

 

He let Tina keep it. I'm also going to disagree about Will not caring about any of the students as individuals. I can nitpick about the way he handled things, but his heart is usually in the right place. In "Wheels" he stood up for Artie when the other kids were being insensitive towards him. Throughout much of season 1 he cut Quinn a lot of slack because he knew she was going through a hard time. "Bad Reputation" is a good example. When the show decided to take Kurt's bullying seriously,

(contd) Will was an advocate for him in “Furt” and when Kurt returned to Dalton. He was on Kurt’s side in that talk with Burt/Kurt and Karofsky/his dad. To be clear, I agree that Finn is the student Will is closest to. Even so, he HAS been there for many of the other kids when they were going through hard times. You can nitpick the way he handled Kurt’s bullying in season 1, but that was bad writing all around. IMO, Will has suffered more than any other character for the abrupt tone changes.

Your very last sentence gets a big amen from me, and it’s the reason why I can’t hate Will as a person: because most of my objections with him come from him having to be a Plot Device instead of a character. But going back for a moment…

I would ask for examples of when he cut Quinn slack. I’m not good at Season One, mind, I haven’t actually seen all the episodes, so I might be missing something. But what I tend to take from it in general is that Will has no trouble letting anyone in his class run ramrod over anyone else, until that moment when he objects because he has to for the plot. 

But Kurt’s bullying…I’m not going to nitpick how he handled it in season one, because season two is when he became absolutely monstrous on screen. To watch a kid, one of his group, one of his outcasts, get slammed into lockers, and to actually say to him ‘huh, you’re not sucking it up as easily as you usually do’ is HORRIBLE. Not only is he saying that he has known for a while that Kurt deals with bullying and puts on a brave face, he’s also basically saying that he watches it happening and does nothing.

For me Sue was the hero in Furt. But assuming that Will’s motives were pure, that he wasn’t pushed into action because Kurt finally snapped and demanded that someone pay attention to what was happening, then yes, he gets some credit. But not enough. A man rising to action once things reach crisis-level is good, but when he goes back to the usual apathy once that crisis is over, then what’s the point? Will knows that most of his kids are bullied in the halls, does he take what he learned from Kurt and apply it to them? No, he keeps on being oblivious. 

But your final point stands loudly: Will goes on being oblivious because Glee has to keep showing us that the kids are underdogs. Because once half the glee club is football players and cheerleaders, and once all the glee performances are cheered on enthusiastically by the student body, and once almost every candidate for prom king and queen come from the ranks of the glee club…well, you have to show by some stretch of plot that despite all that these are still the loser kids. 

Like I said in my big long rant, Will is the character who most embodies offscreen decisions made for business purposes. The same people singing, the songs that are hyped up in one episode never actually showing up in competition, the fact that they can’t be shown to rehearse weeks before Nationals because we can’t give screen time to songs in more than one episode, because We Can’t Sell the Same Single Twice…

Will is the fall guy for just about every lousy choice the writers make. I absolutely agree with that. Unfortunately bad writing choices make up the canon of Glee, so even if we judge him knowing that it’s bad writing, that’s all we have to judge him on, and he suffers badly for it. 

I've decided to come off anon. I was the one asking about Will Schuester. I think you made some good points, but I hope you don 't mind if I politely offer some counterpoints. To be fair, Will never denied anyone a solo in class. The debacle in "Wheels" was over a song that was going to be used in Sectionals. I think that was clearly stated in the episode. When Rachel threw a fit about Tina getting the "Tonight" solo, he didn't throw her out, but he also never gave her the solo.

Hi there. :-) Of course I don’t mind! Counterpoints are expected. I’ve had my say, I’ll let you have yours. And…then I’ll have mine again, and so forth. :-)

Wheels suffers from that thing where a song is given importance it will never actually have. Yeah, Will said they were thinking of it for Sectionals. But of course they didn’t actually do it for Sectionals, because Glee can’t sell us the same single twice. We shall call this the Michael Jackson Curse. But Will as a teacher suffers hugely whether it would be used or not, because of how he handled it. Because he said flat-out ‘we will do this epic showstopper for our first big competition and Rachel will sing it,’ and then only changed his mind when he was guilted into it by adults. Because the fact that he assigns these solos in his head, especially for competitions, without giving anyone else a chance to audition…it’s terrible for a teacher of a group of wanna-be singers. I bet you small amounts of money that he did the exact same thing for every solo Rachel got in every competition after that. Except obviously the one that they had auditions for when they needed a Jesse plot that never actually came to anything because Glee can’t sell us the same single twice (see Michael Jackson).

And yes, I give him credit for not backing down immediately to Rachel in Preggers, but when she stormed out instead of taking no for an answer he went after her to beg her to return. He let her get away with saying ‘you are ruining my life by giving someone else a chance’. He didn’t argue, he didn’t point out what a self-centered biyotch she was being, and so in the end he still seems only halfway committed to the idea that Rachel isn’t the only special snowflake. 

Your post about Will makes sense. Even though he's a mess as a leader, I've honestly always seen him as a sympathetic character. He makes A LOT of mistakes, but he tries, and that's why I'll always feel for him somewhat. I've never doubted how much he loves all those kids even though his leadership leaves much to be desired. Of course, I've always liked his friendship with Finn, and I know people who have been that close with their teachers. Different strokes for different folks I guess.
Anonymous

I dunno. He’s an earnest little guy, that’s for sure. And just like Blaine even the things that are most flawed about him don’t make him, like, an irredeemable psychopath. 

He would be a great uncle for one of the kids, or, like, a buddy in a Big Brother program or something. 

The problem is that he isn’t a mentor or uncle or random cool adult. He is the teacher in charge of the thing that, we’re continually told, is ALL most of these kids have going for them. He is the one person who was in a position to treat them all as equals, or make sure they were ready for competitions, or remind them that High School =/= Life. 

He loves those kids, sure. But he loves them the way he trains for competitions: in his head only. His loving them is like his wanting a trophy, something that is powerful in his mind but falls apart in the execution. He loves some of them actively, like Finn and Rachel. But the rest of them seem to just exist in this generic Glee Club cloud inside his mind, and he loves the shit out of that little cloud but day to day he can’t be arsed with actually showing them real affection as individuals. 

If he loved everyone in the group, he would have kicked Rachel out the first time she threw a diva shit-fit over someone else getting almost-equal treatment. The moment she was clear about how her presence was more important than The Group. He didn’t throw her out, though, because he wants to win. Because Nationals. Even towards the start of Season One: NATIONALS. Because that’s more important to him than actually sending the message that any of them should be allowed to sing a song during a class, even if it’s a song that Rachel Berry likes. Hell, he SHOULD sent the message that all of them deserve solos in competitions too, but to deny someone a song in CLASS? In a weekly assignment that will make or break absolutely no one’s future in any remote way? The very first time he let Rachel get away with that shit, that was the beginning of the end for him as a fair and effective teacher.

In any other position he would be bumbling but well-meaning and mostly harmless. In the position he’s actually in? He’s a giant bucket of harm. 


Okay, just to clarify: I don’t hate Blaine. I hate things about him, but I don’t think he’s some raging psychopath without redeeming qualities. He is oblivious, which in a better show would be a character quirk that would actually be commented on and explored. He’s egocentric, and hell, I love Sebastian so obviously that isn’t a dealbreaker. 
If Blaine’s flaws were addressed as flaws…jesus, if they were even acknowledged as existing, he might be an interesting character. He is a Nice Guy Asshole, which could be awesome to watch. A well-meaning dick. If they wanted to explore him as that…seriously, I could grow to love the hell out of him. But they don’t explore that. These flaws come through over and over again, but what they’re writing is Blaine as Mr. Perfect.
And if you want to know how they can write flaws for him but still write him as perfect…imagine the opposite of Blaine and it becomes clearer. Imagine if a character on a show was described by other characters as an asshole. They talk about him as being an obnoxious dick, and every main good-guy character on the show despises him. They warn people away from him. Every time he appears there’s ominous music in the background. But every scene that he’s in, all he does and says are nice things. He asks someone how they’re doing, and they sneer at him because he’s such a huge asshole. He puts money in a can for a charity and if anyone even notices it then they say he must be getting rid of money he stole from someone else or something. We are obviously meant to think that this guy is a jerk, because the camera likes to show him in bad lighting, with dark music playing, and every character that we’re meant to sympathize with on the show seriously believes he’s an evil guy. But while they tell us that he’s a dick they show us that he’s the nicest guy around.
The reverse of that is Blaine. He shows up like Prince Charming, we’re told over and over again, by every kind of character, how perfect and talented and special he is, but every time he’s on camera he seems to say or do something so completely dickish, and either no one notices or people excuse it away for him. 
That is what I can’t stand about Blaine. I don’t hate him as a character, but I wish they would treat him as the character they’re writing him as. If they did that, if people called him out for being a tremendous chode and made that an actual aspect of his character, he might be an interesting guy. 
Now! That being said…
Will is…ugh. Will was doomed from the start, because he’s the adult character in a teenager show. You can get away with having adults and kids in focus on the same show, but not one adult and a pile of kids. Because what you have to do is have Will’s plots revolve around the kids (hence his inappropriate amounts of friendship with Finn) and he has to play the role of too many adult figures (hence his shift from mentor to tyrant to buddy to teacher in any given episode). Plus he has to be the person onscreen who represents the offscreen decision to have the same two or three people sing over and over again in the name of iTunes sales, which shows through him as rampant favoritism to the point of consciously excluding the same misfit kids that he was so eager to recruit into the group. The offscreen business decision makes no onscreen sense, because a school glee club with weekly song assignments should absolutely stress participation by everyone.
I think that’s a big reason why Will is a mess, because he is the only regular and meaningful adult presence in a sea of children, with occasional Sue or Figgins or Emma showing up when he can’t do everything himself, or when it’s determined that his creeper level is getting too high so it’s time to show him with his adult girlfriend. 
No matter the reason why, though, Will is a huge, giant, stinking mess. 
For me the quintessential Will-as-glee-coach moment was in Theatricality, right at the end. When the glee club stands together and talks about being freaks together, and Will says ‘good, because I had no idea what the lesson was supposed to be’. That, in a nutshell, is Will. He’s someone who the kids flourish in spite of, not because of. These kids do great things, and since he’s the adult along for the ride he is given credit that he absolutely doesn’t deserve.
This is a guy whose entire focus since day one has been to win Nationals. Yet this same guy has failed to have a finalized set list or choreography or costumes one week before Nationals for two years in a row, despite winning Sectionals weeks and weeks earlier. This guy sent a plane of kids to New York for a national competition saying ‘eh, they’ll write some songs, it’ll be fine’. And if you think a single other club that knew they were on their way to a possible national title handled their performance that flippantly, you’re nuts.
In fact, them winning the title this year almost makes sense, because the glee club that didn’t give a shit about rehearsing were voted winners by judges who  didn’t give a shit about judging.
When his incompetence is called out, rarely, it seems to be in that fanservice way that says ‘if we write in a line of dialogue about it, we don’t actually have to do anything about it’. Emma tells him flat-out that he ignores students in favor of others, nothing changes. One of the original members of that club gives her one wish for the future as a request to sing a song, and he laughs. He lets one student get away with murder and then acts shocked when another student attempts to get away with some small slight. He breaks laws to blackmail an innocent student into doing what he wants, but of course when he admits it three years later it’s blown off like nothing.
He is a hypocritical, incompetent, ineffectual teacher who ought to be fired but instead gets awards. Back when Glee was a satire about high school his character worked at least a little. Once the show became serious and his character stayed exactly as he was, the absurdities about him became gross flaws. 
So…yeah, upon reflection I don’t really like Will. 

Okay, just to clarify: I don’t hate Blaine. I hate things about him, but I don’t think he’s some raging psychopath without redeeming qualities. He is oblivious, which in a better show would be a character quirk that would actually be commented on and explored. He’s egocentric, and hell, I love Sebastian so obviously that isn’t a dealbreaker. 

If Blaine’s flaws were addressed as flaws…jesus, if they were even acknowledged as existing, he might be an interesting character. He is a Nice Guy Asshole, which could be awesome to watch. A well-meaning dick. If they wanted to explore him as that…seriously, I could grow to love the hell out of him. But they don’t explore that. These flaws come through over and over again, but what they’re writing is Blaine as Mr. Perfect.

And if you want to know how they can write flaws for him but still write him as perfect…imagine the opposite of Blaine and it becomes clearer. Imagine if a character on a show was described by other characters as an asshole. They talk about him as being an obnoxious dick, and every main good-guy character on the show despises him. They warn people away from him. Every time he appears there’s ominous music in the background. But every scene that he’s in, all he does and says are nice things. He asks someone how they’re doing, and they sneer at him because he’s such a huge asshole. He puts money in a can for a charity and if anyone even notices it then they say he must be getting rid of money he stole from someone else or something. We are obviously meant to think that this guy is a jerk, because the camera likes to show him in bad lighting, with dark music playing, and every character that we’re meant to sympathize with on the show seriously believes he’s an evil guy. But while they tell us that he’s a dick they show us that he’s the nicest guy around.

The reverse of that is Blaine. He shows up like Prince Charming, we’re told over and over again, by every kind of character, how perfect and talented and special he is, but every time he’s on camera he seems to say or do something so completely dickish, and either no one notices or people excuse it away for him. 

That is what I can’t stand about Blaine. I don’t hate him as a character, but I wish they would treat him as the character they’re writing him as. If they did that, if people called him out for being a tremendous chode and made that an actual aspect of his character, he might be an interesting guy. 

Now! That being said…

Will is…ugh. Will was doomed from the start, because he’s the adult character in a teenager show. You can get away with having adults and kids in focus on the same show, but not one adult and a pile of kids. Because what you have to do is have Will’s plots revolve around the kids (hence his inappropriate amounts of friendship with Finn) and he has to play the role of too many adult figures (hence his shift from mentor to tyrant to buddy to teacher in any given episode). Plus he has to be the person onscreen who represents the offscreen decision to have the same two or three people sing over and over again in the name of iTunes sales, which shows through him as rampant favoritism to the point of consciously excluding the same misfit kids that he was so eager to recruit into the group. The offscreen business decision makes no onscreen sense, because a school glee club with weekly song assignments should absolutely stress participation by everyone.

I think that’s a big reason why Will is a mess, because he is the only regular and meaningful adult presence in a sea of children, with occasional Sue or Figgins or Emma showing up when he can’t do everything himself, or when it’s determined that his creeper level is getting too high so it’s time to show him with his adult girlfriend. 

No matter the reason why, though, Will is a huge, giant, stinking mess. 

For me the quintessential Will-as-glee-coach moment was in Theatricality, right at the end. When the glee club stands together and talks about being freaks together, and Will says ‘good, because I had no idea what the lesson was supposed to be’. That, in a nutshell, is Will. He’s someone who the kids flourish in spite of, not because of. These kids do great things, and since he’s the adult along for the ride he is given credit that he absolutely doesn’t deserve.

This is a guy whose entire focus since day one has been to win Nationals. Yet this same guy has failed to have a finalized set list or choreography or costumes one week before Nationals for two years in a row, despite winning Sectionals weeks and weeks earlier. This guy sent a plane of kids to New York for a national competition saying ‘eh, they’ll write some songs, it’ll be fine’. And if you think a single other club that knew they were on their way to a possible national title handled their performance that flippantly, you’re nuts.

In fact, them winning the title this year almost makes sense, because the glee club that didn’t give a shit about rehearsing were voted winners by judges who  didn’t give a shit about judging.

When his incompetence is called out, rarely, it seems to be in that fanservice way that says ‘if we write in a line of dialogue about it, we don’t actually have to do anything about it’. Emma tells him flat-out that he ignores students in favor of others, nothing changes. One of the original members of that club gives her one wish for the future as a request to sing a song, and he laughs. He lets one student get away with murder and then acts shocked when another student attempts to get away with some small slight. He breaks laws to blackmail an innocent student into doing what he wants, but of course when he admits it three years later it’s blown off like nothing.

He is a hypocritical, incompetent, ineffectual teacher who ought to be fired but instead gets awards. Back when Glee was a satire about high school his character worked at least a little. Once the show became serious and his character stayed exactly as he was, the absurdities about him became gross flaws. 

So…yeah, upon reflection I don’t really like Will. 

So I just read your post about why you dislike Blaine and, while I completely agree with you, I couldn't help but notice how it's the same thing with Finn, isn't it? That he makes mistakes, but is often not called out on them and, instead, is made to look like the hero. Yet you don't seem to hate him. Why? It's also funny how the majority of the fandom hates Finn for that, but don't seem to mind it when it comes to Blaine.
Anonymous

Here’s the big difference between Finn and Blaine in my view (keeping in mind that I fast-forward through Finchel scenes like a boss, and there’s a lot about Finn that I just haven’t paid attention to):

Finn knows that he’s flawed. Finn is the first person to admit that he’s not that smart, that he makes mistakes, he doesn’t think he’s all that talented…he doesn’t think highly of himself at all. Finn owned up to his mistakes regarding his treatment of Kurt, standing in front of an entire wedding party and saying outright ‘I’ve sucked as a brother so far.’

Blaine? Nothing. Blaine is absolutely oblivious to his own flaws. He says stupid things that hurt the person he supposedly cares about, and goes on his merry way until Kurt comes to him to apologize for it. The one time that Blaine apologized, after the night at Scandals, it was one of those nonapologies - I was drunk and I’m sorry. Really? Are you sorry for being drunk or are you sorry for terrifying your boyfriend by dragging him into the backseat of a car and not taking no for an answer the first thirteen times? Are you sorry that the timing wasn’t perfect or are you sorry that you became the bad guy in one of those no-means-no tv movies usually directed towards teenage girls? It’s one of those bullshit apologies where someone gives themselves an out at the same time. ‘Here’s the reason why I did what I did, which I’m sorry for.’ 

When Finn outed Santana I was enraged at him. And the events that followed…I know people are outraged at the idea of the straight white guy playing hero for the gay female POC, but the message that it sends notwithstanding…Finn did come to help her. He did try to make it better. Blaine has never done that. 

Besides, when Finn does things like out Santana, other characters do call him out on it. Even if Santana forgave him too fast, she was still pissed. She still told him flat out that he ruined her life and then slapped his face. Compare that to Blaine calling Sam a cheap slut in front of all his friends. How did Sam react? No idea, because the next time they’re together they’re hugging like pals. How did Finn react? He apologized to Blaine (after Blaine told him that he was pretending the punching bag he was pounding on was both Sam and Finn, which…WHAT?)

And hey, while we’re at it, that scene right there is the antithesis of your argument. Because the point of that scene was that Finn saw that he was pushing Blaine too far, and he went to him to apologize for his actions. Which is BS in my book, but he still did it. He confessed to being jealous of Blaine’s awesome and lashing out at him when Blaine just didn’t deserve it, wah wah wah. 

Finn has fucked up in ways that have gone unrecognized now and then, yeah. Blaine does it ALL THE TIME. Blaine has NEVER been called out for anything he’s done. Blaine has never willingly owned up to anything, and I’m absolutely convinced that he truly believes he never does a thing wrong, ever.

It’s a huge difference. 

Glee, Season 3 Re-Do, How It Should Have Gone Down: Kurt getting into NYADA

Yup, pretty much.